Measured costs
Documented costs, such as premium freight, rework, additional incoming inspection or extra administrative effort.
Basis: measured costsMETHODOLOGY / SUPPLIER PERFORMANCE IN CONTEXT
Performance describes delivery against expectations. Criticality describes dependency. Business Impact describes the business significance.
These perspectives are connected, but they are not interchangeable — and no single score can replace them.
Performance + dependency + business relevance → priority
→ Action + ownership → follow-up assessment
Delivery reliability, quality, collaboration and operational consequences create a multidimensional view of performance.
The current evaluation model covers 30 criteria across four calculation dimensions: Procurement, Research & Development, Plants & Planning, and Quality. Dimension scores reveal differences. Performance history shows progress. An overall score is a summary — it must not hide a critical weakness.
Meaningful comparisons require consistent periods, assessment dimensions and data. A missing value is neither a neutral nor a good score.
The four assessment dimensionsA supplier can perform well today and still be structurally critical. Conversely, weak performance with limited dependency may require less urgent action.
Risk Exposure gives supplier risk a business context. It is neither a guaranteed loss amount nor a prediction.
Documented costs, such as premium freight, rework, additional incoming inspection or extra administrative effort.
Basis: measured costsA potential business consequence based on stated assumptions and a clearly defined scenario.
Basis: disclosed assumptionsA business-relevant value linked to a dependency — for example, where supply or revenue relevance is high.
Basis: dependency & reference valueA model-based financial view of risk; neither a recorded loss nor a forecast.
Basis: evaluation modelDocumented cost reductions against a reliable baseline. A reduction in exposure alone is not sufficient evidence.
Basis: documented changeCosts, estimates and exposed values may refer to different periods or overlapping consequences. Data, timeframes, assumptions and potential double counting must remain transparent.
A combined view explains where action should take priority. Every action needs a specific problem, a responsible person or role, a due date and an expected impact.
Performance history shows changes; a follow-up assessment can be initiated. Whether an action caused an improvement must be checked against implementation, available data and other influencing factors.
Here, improving value creation means focusing improvement work on relevant business consequences. It is not a general promise of savings.
Explore the action processYOUR DATA. YOUR BUSINESS CONTEXT.